Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 834185" data-attributes="member: 12952"><a href="http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/" target="_blank">Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire</a>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Defend Our Freedoms Foundation World&#039;s Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site<a href="http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=21319" target="_blank">the argument before the 9th Circuit court of Appeals</a>&nbsp;I represent Ambassador Alan Keyes,&nbsp; 10 state representatives and 30 members of the military. I have 40 clients with different standing and more hearings and&nbsp; motions and decisions, as I was an attorney on the case the whole time.&nbsp; Unfotunately a dirty trick was played in relation to time to speak&nbsp; during the oral argument.&nbsp;If you read all of Kreep’s and Berg’s arguments until now, they argued,&nbsp; that Natural born is one born in the country. I was arguing that it is a&nbsp; combination of birth and citizenship of parents. Also, none of the&nbsp; attorneys dared to touch the issue of social secuity fraud. I am the&nbsp; only one, who raised it in my pleadings. Again, if arguendo the BC is&nbsp; correct, there is still SSN fraud, which would not only remove Obama&nbsp; from office, but will have him in prison.&nbsp;I filed a motion with the court of Appeals asking for the maximum&nbsp; time, which is&nbsp; 20 minutes for the defendant and 20 for the plaintiffs.&nbsp; The court of appeals granted maximum time and stated that we need to&nbsp; divide it equally between 2 cases and the case with the lower numerical&nbsp; number goes first. Kreep’s appeal started with 09-, my started with 10-,&nbsp; so he was first. He was supposed to talk for 10 minutes and stop and&nbsp; let me speak for 10 minutes. Instead Kreep did something totally creepy:&nbsp; he spoke for 18 minute and said that he wants the remaining 2 minutes&nbsp; for rebuttal. He clearly saw that the clock was set for 20 minutes,&nbsp; which was supposed to be divided. Luckily, as I stepped to the lectern, I&nbsp; noticed that the clock showed 2 minutes left and argued and demanded my&nbsp; full 10 minutes, but what Kreep did, was a really dirty trick.We will have to wait and see, what the court will decide. Keep in mind,&nbsp; it is 9th circuit, most liberal in the country and we are talking&nbsp; about a liberal president. &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 834185, member: 12952"] [B][URL="http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/"]Dr. Orly Taitz Esquire[/URL][/B] [B]Defend Our Freedoms Foundation [/B] World's Leading Obama Eligibility Challenge Web Site [B][URL="http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=21319"]the argument before the 9th Circuit court of Appeals[/URL][/B] I represent Ambassador Alan Keyes, 10 state representatives and 30 members of the military. I have 40 clients with different standing and more hearings and motions and decisions, as I was an attorney on the case the whole time. Unfotunately a dirty trick was played in relation to time to speak during the oral argument. If you read all of Kreep’s and Berg’s arguments until now, they argued, that Natural born is one born in the country. I was arguing that it is a combination of birth and citizenship of parents. Also, none of the attorneys dared to touch the issue of social secuity fraud. I am the only one, who raised it in my pleadings. Again, if arguendo the BC is correct, there is still SSN fraud, which would not only remove Obama from office, but will have him in prison. I filed a motion with the court of Appeals asking for the maximum time, which is 20 minutes for the defendant and 20 for the plaintiffs. The court of appeals granted maximum time and stated that we need to divide it equally between 2 cases and the case with the lower numerical number goes first. Kreep’s appeal started with 09-, my started with 10-, so he was first. He was supposed to talk for 10 minutes and stop and let me speak for 10 minutes. Instead Kreep did something totally creepy: he spoke for 18 minute and said that he wants the remaining 2 minutes for rebuttal. He clearly saw that the clock was set for 20 minutes, which was supposed to be divided. Luckily, as I stepped to the lectern, I noticed that the clock showed 2 minutes left and argued and demanded my full 10 minutes, but what Kreep did, was a really dirty trick. We will have to wait and see, what the court will decide. Keep in mind, it is 9th circuit, most liberal in the country and we are talking about a liberal president. [COLOR=#6A1413][CENTER] [/CENTER][/COLOR][CENTER][/CENTER] [/QUOTE]

Verification