Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Babagounj" data-source="post: 877429" data-attributes="member: 12952">CERTIFIGATEHow does Obama&#039;s document stack up against genuine BC?Volunteer produces Kapiolani form from same time period as president&#039;s&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; A professional typographer with 50 years experience in the business&nbsp; has confirmed that the typeface in an authentic Hawaii Department of&nbsp; Health long-form birth certificate issued in 1961 is consistent, and&nbsp; concludes the document released by the White House as Barack Obama&#039;s&nbsp; 1961 birth certificate – with its typeface anomalies – is anything but&nbsp; genuine.&quot;From the beginning, when I saw that some of the typed letters on&nbsp; the Obama long-form birth certificate did not match for size or style, I&nbsp; found evidence the document was a forgery,&quot; retired New York City&nbsp; typographer Paul Irey told WND.&nbsp; &quot;Still, I wanted to see other birth&nbsp; certificates from the same era and from the same office in the state of&nbsp; Hawaii.&quot;A comparison birth certificate appearsThe breakthrough making comparative analysis possible came only&nbsp; after a WND reader born in Kapiolani Hospital in Hawaii within about two&nbsp; weeks of Barack Obama&#039;s birth voluntarily submitted to WND her own&nbsp; known-to-be-authentic birth certificate for analysis.....the known-to-be-authentic birth certificate, shown&nbsp; was issued&nbsp; for a baby born in Kapiolani Hospital on Aug. 23, 1961, exactly 19 days&nbsp; after Barack Obama was born at the same hospital, on Aug. 4, 1961.<img src="http://www.wnd.com/images/2011/07/090811AuthenticBC.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />&nbsp; Exhibit 1. Authentic 1961 comparison Hawaii Birth Certificate, Kapiolani&nbsp; Hospital, Aug. 23, 1961, redacted to conceal private identifying&nbsp; information, front side&nbsp; <img src="http://www.wnd.com/images/2011/07/090811AuthenticStamp.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />&nbsp; Exhibit 2, Authentic 1961 comparison Hawaii Birth Certificate,&nbsp; Kapiolani Hospital, Aug. 23, 1961, reverse side, showing registrar&#039;s&nbsp; date stamp, registrar&#039;s name/authentication stamp, and embossed state&nbsp; seal&nbsp;&nbsp; .The 1961 comparison birth certificate has the registrar&#039;s name stamp&nbsp; and the registrar&#039;s authentication/name stamp on the reverse side of the&nbsp; document, while the registrar stamps on the Obama birth certificate&nbsp; appear on the front side of the document.The state seal is obvious in the 1961 comparison birth&nbsp; certificate, while the state seal is virtually invisible to the naked&nbsp; eye in the Obama long-form birth certificate PDF and Xerox copies&nbsp; released by the White House on April 27.Note also, that the 1961 comparison birth certificate shows no&nbsp; smiley face in the &quot;A&quot; of &quot;Alvin&quot; in the registrar&#039;s authentication/name&nbsp; stamp, nor is the &quot;THE&quot; in &quot;THE RECORD&quot; misspelled as &quot;TXE RECORD,&quot; as&nbsp; WND has documented regarding the Obama birth certificate.&#039;There&#039;s no doubt the Obama&#039;s birth certificate is a forgery&#039;After analyzing the typeface on the two documents Irey felt the&nbsp; results of the study were conclusive: &quot;Obama&#039;s birth certificate was&nbsp; typed on more than one typewriter – just what we would expect if the&nbsp; document was forged.&nbsp; The authentic 1961 birth certificate was typed on&nbsp; only one typewriter – just what we would expect if the document was&nbsp; legitimate.&quot;To make it clear, he said, &quot;This comparison study done with&nbsp; another birth certificate that authentically came from a person born at&nbsp; Kapiolani Hospital shortly after Obama alleges he was born there has&nbsp; proven to me that we have one birth certificate with many mismatching&nbsp; typed letters – Obama&#039;s birth certificate – and then we have another&nbsp; from the same hospital without any mismatched letters.&quot;He continued: &quot;Common sense tells us that Obama&#039;s birth&nbsp; certificate is a forgery, precisely because the letters typed on the&nbsp; document don&#039;t match.&quot;Irey was willing to stake his professional reputation on this result.&quot;My 50 years in typography, my 25 years composing pages with&nbsp; Macintosh computers, and owning and using nearly every type of&nbsp; reproduction equipment leave me no doubt: the Obama birth certificate is&nbsp; a forgery.&quot;Irey said not only is the Obama birth certificate a forgery, but&nbsp; it is &quot;a poorly done forgery that only an inexperienced [person] would&nbsp; ever dare claim was authentic.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Babagounj, post: 877429, member: 12952"] [COLOR=#000000][B]CERTIFIGATE[/B] How does Obama's document stack up against [I]genuine[/I] BC? Volunteer produces Kapiolani form from same time period as president's[/COLOR] A professional typographer with 50 years experience in the business has confirmed that the typeface in an authentic Hawaii Department of Health long-form birth certificate issued in 1961 is consistent, and concludes the document released by the White House as Barack Obama's 1961 birth certificate – with its typeface anomalies – is anything but genuine. "From the beginning, when I saw that some of the typed letters on the Obama long-form birth certificate did not match for size or style, I found evidence the document was a forgery," retired New York City typographer Paul Irey told WND. "Still, I wanted to see other birth certificates from the same era and from the same office in the state of Hawaii." [B]A comparison birth certificate appears[/B] The breakthrough making comparative analysis possible came only after a WND reader born in Kapiolani Hospital in Hawaii within about two weeks of Barack Obama's birth voluntarily submitted to WND her own known-to-be-authentic birth certificate for analysis. ....the known-to-be-authentic birth certificate, shown was issued for a baby born in Kapiolani Hospital on Aug. 23, 1961, exactly 19 days after Barack Obama was born at the same hospital, on Aug. 4, 1961. [IMG]http://www.wnd.com/images/2011/07/090811AuthenticBC.jpg[/IMG] [FONT=arial] Exhibit 1. Authentic 1961 comparison Hawaii Birth Certificate, Kapiolani Hospital, Aug. 23, 1961, redacted to conceal private identifying information, front side [/FONT] [IMG]http://www.wnd.com/images/2011/07/090811AuthenticStamp.jpg[/IMG] [FONT=arial] Exhibit 2, Authentic 1961 comparison Hawaii Birth Certificate, Kapiolani Hospital, Aug. 23, 1961, reverse side, showing registrar's date stamp, registrar's name/authentication stamp, and embossed state seal . [/FONT] The 1961 comparison birth certificate has the registrar's name stamp and the registrar's authentication/name stamp on the reverse side of the document, while the registrar stamps on the Obama birth certificate appear on the front side of the document. The state seal is obvious in the 1961 comparison birth certificate, while the state seal is virtually invisible to the naked eye in the Obama long-form birth certificate PDF and Xerox copies released by the White House on April 27. Note also, that the 1961 comparison birth certificate shows no smiley face in the "A" of "Alvin" in the registrar's authentication/name stamp, nor is the "THE" in "THE RECORD" misspelled as "TXE RECORD," as WND has documented regarding the Obama birth certificate. '[B]There's no doubt the Obama's birth certificate is a forgery'[/B] After analyzing the typeface on the two documents Irey felt the results of the study were conclusive: "Obama's birth certificate was typed on more than one typewriter – just what we would expect if the document was forged. The authentic 1961 birth certificate was typed on only one typewriter – just what we would expect if the document was legitimate." To make it clear, he said, "This comparison study done with another birth certificate that authentically came from a person born at Kapiolani Hospital shortly after Obama alleges he was born there has proven to me that we have one birth certificate with many mismatching typed letters – Obama's birth certificate – and then we have another from the same hospital without any mismatched letters." He continued: "Common sense tells us that Obama's birth certificate is a forgery, precisely because the letters typed on the document don't match." Irey was willing to stake his professional reputation on this result. "My 50 years in typography, my 25 years composing pages with Macintosh computers, and owning and using nearly every type of reproduction equipment leave me no doubt: the Obama birth certificate is a forgery." Irey said not only is the Obama birth certificate a forgery, but it is "a poorly done forgery that only an inexperienced [person] would ever dare claim was authentic." [/QUOTE]

Verification