Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Please don't follow FedEx method
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheBrownNote" data-source="post: 5868791" data-attributes="member: 70462"><p>No, I'm not retarded. I don't act in a manner where it matters whether or not I'm being recorded. I'm just saying that the idea of Ring's ability to film and be activated to film beyond ones property, (ie your motion sensor goes off and records the dude walking across the street) that is a gross over reach of "expectations of privacy in the public". Especially when stored on a private server that can be recalled without a warrant. </p><p></p><p>Example. My neighbors ring doorbell will activate in the middle of the night when I enter my bathroom across the street on the second floor. Is this technically Ring's fault, no. It's my neighbor's. But I should have the right to prevent ring from storing my likeness on any of their servers. (Don't get me started on the creep that is my neighbor)</p><p></p><p>The called out statement about no permission is for Ring. Should one ever decide to seek litigation, one has evidence of declaration of intent. </p><p></p><p>As far as the homeowner, film away on your property, but in my state audio is a 2 party permission, wether video or audio only, so this declarative statement holds legal weight, for audio purposes at least.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheBrownNote, post: 5868791, member: 70462"] No, I'm not retarded. I don't act in a manner where it matters whether or not I'm being recorded. I'm just saying that the idea of Ring's ability to film and be activated to film beyond ones property, (ie your motion sensor goes off and records the dude walking across the street) that is a gross over reach of "expectations of privacy in the public". Especially when stored on a private server that can be recalled without a warrant. Example. My neighbors ring doorbell will activate in the middle of the night when I enter my bathroom across the street on the second floor. Is this technically Ring's fault, no. It's my neighbor's. But I should have the right to prevent ring from storing my likeness on any of their servers. (Don't get me started on the creep that is my neighbor) The called out statement about no permission is for Ring. Should one ever decide to seek litigation, one has evidence of declaration of intent. As far as the homeowner, film away on your property, but in my state audio is a 2 party permission, wether video or audio only, so this declarative statement holds legal weight, for audio purposes at least. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Please don't follow FedEx method
Top