Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 1590343" data-attributes="member: 2189">Nope.  You ignored the officer lying and focused solely on the woman.  This is not the first time an issue like this comes up and you use deflection to move the goalposts.  The reason the woman is now free is the police officer lied but let's focus on the woman to re-convict her in the court of public opinion, making her bad again and thus the lying officer is somehow justified.  She's not convicted of what she is charged but rather convicted for what she wasn't.  In that narrative, none of us are say from guilt as a result of false charges.Had you said, "this is not to justify the officer lying but the woman had skeletons too" makes your point while not protecting lying.Again, it's what you didn't say.</blockquote>