Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Poll: APWA-Support or Oppose
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tieguy" data-source="post: 187952" data-attributes="member: 1912"><p><span style="color: blue">Mechanics plan is private and its much better. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">The other side of this that is often ignored is the insurance of the plans. If another poster here is correct and CS is 46 percent vested then its in serious danger of collapse. The insurance payout for a private plan is about 4 times greater then the payout for a multi-employer plan. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="color: #0000ff">If the teamsters were smart they would move to privitization and squash the APWA threat. </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tieguy, post: 187952, member: 1912"] [COLOR=blue]Mechanics plan is private and its much better. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]The other side of this that is often ignored is the insurance of the plans. If another poster here is correct and CS is 46 percent vested then its in serious danger of collapse. The insurance payout for a private plan is about 4 times greater then the payout for a multi-employer plan. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff][/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]If the teamsters were smart they would move to privitization and squash the APWA threat. [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Poll: APWA-Support or Oppose
Top