Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
Pornography: Harmless entertainment or dangerous sin?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="soberups" data-source="post: 1104457" data-attributes="member: 14668"><p>There was a classic scene in the movie "About Schmidt" where a topless Kathy Bates gets into a hot tub and attempts to seduce Jack Nicholson.</p><p></p><p>Porn or not porn?</p><p></p><p>Kathy Bates is an amazing actress. She is also an overweight 50-something woman with saggy boobs. She is well respected in the industry, with an impressive body of work, and unlike many young actresses who give up a boob shot in an attempt to advance their careers in Hollywood, she did the boob shot in this movie for comic effect and because (I think at least) she thought it would be <em>fun</em>. It was most certainly done of her own free will, and she was most certainly <em>not</em> being exploited or denigrated in any way.</p><p></p><p>The moral of this story for me is that I dont define porn in terms of which body part or sex act is or is not visible on the camera, I define porn by who is or is not being <u><em>exploited, denigrated and objectified.</em></u></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="soberups, post: 1104457, member: 14668"] There was a classic scene in the movie "About Schmidt" where a topless Kathy Bates gets into a hot tub and attempts to seduce Jack Nicholson. Porn or not porn? Kathy Bates is an amazing actress. She is also an overweight 50-something woman with saggy boobs. She is well respected in the industry, with an impressive body of work, and unlike many young actresses who give up a boob shot in an attempt to advance their careers in Hollywood, she did the boob shot in this movie for comic effect and because (I think at least) she thought it would be [I]fun[/I]. It was most certainly done of her own free will, and she was most certainly [I]not[/I] being exploited or denigrated in any way. The moral of this story for me is that I dont define porn in terms of which body part or sex act is or is not visible on the camera, I define porn by who is or is not being [U][I]exploited, denigrated and objectified.[/I][/U] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
Life After Brown
Pornography: Harmless entertainment or dangerous sin?
Top