Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="moreluck" data-source="post: 1135132" data-attributes="member: 1246">Affordable (?) Care Act.....is a misnomer !!Yes, he said “cut.”Via <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama-1-trillion-in-obamacare-spending-is-historic-tax-cut/article/2529406?custom_click=rss" target="_blank">Washington Examiner</a>:As part of a Mothers’ Day weekend defense of his signature legislative accomplishment, President Obama claimed that the law represented the “largest health care tax cut for working families and small businesses in our history. “ [...]

Far from being a historic tax cut, Obamacare actually qualifies as one of the largest tax increases in history. It contains roughly $1 trillion in taxes — on insurance plans, medical devices and investment income. 
And many of the taxes will end up falling on the middle class. The law’s individual mandate, which the Obama administration successful argued was a tax before the U.S. Supreme Court, is projected to hit nearly 5 million Americans with incomes under $60,000 by 2016.
</blockquote>

[QUOTE="moreluck, post: 1135132, member: 1246"] Affordable (?) Care Act.....is a misnomer !! Yes, he said “cut.” Via [URL="http://washingtonexaminer.com/obama-1-trillion-in-obamacare-spending-is-historic-tax-cut/article/2529406?custom_click=rss"]Washington Examiner[/URL]: [INDENT]As part of a Mothers’ Day weekend defense of his signature legislative accomplishment, President Obama claimed that the law represented the “largest health care tax cut for working families and small businesses in our history. “ [...] Far from being a historic tax cut, Obamacare actually qualifies as one of the largest tax increases in history. It contains roughly $1 trillion in taxes — on insurance plans, medical devices and investment income. And many of the taxes will end up falling on the middle class. The law’s individual mandate, which the Obama administration successful argued was a tax before the U.S. Supreme Court, is projected to hit nearly 5 million Americans with incomes under $60,000 by 2016. [/INDENT] [/QUOTE]

Verification