Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="brett636" data-source="post: 687401" data-attributes="member: 249">Re: Obamanation here todayWell lets do the math and find out.50,000 x .15 = $7500 250,000 x .15 = $37500 So yes, the stockbroker does pay a significant amount more than the bricklayer because he makes more money.&nbsp; At the end of the day both end up with 85% of their pay.&nbsp; Wow, you are capable of some basic logic!&nbsp; I&#039;m happy for you!Oh, never mind, you blew it here.&nbsp; Very to easy answer to this problem, and that is the stockbroker is more likely to stimulate the economy because as he invests money with companies those companies use that money to invest in their business.&nbsp; Perhaps some of those companies will invest in new buildings giving the bricklayer some work to do allowing him to keep food on his table and a solid roof over his family&#039;s head.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="brett636, post: 687401, member: 249"] [b]Re: Obamanation here today[/b] Well lets do the math and find out. 50,000 x .15 = $7500 250,000 x .15 = $37500 So yes, the stockbroker does pay a significant amount more than the bricklayer because he makes more money. At the end of the day both end up with 85% of their pay. Wow, you are capable of some basic logic! I'm happy for you! Oh, never mind, you blew it here. Very to easy answer to this problem, and that is the stockbroker is more likely to stimulate the economy because as he invests money with companies those companies use that money to invest in their business. Perhaps some of those companies will invest in new buildings giving the bricklayer some work to do allowing him to keep food on his table and a solid roof over his family's head. [/QUOTE]

Verification