Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Box Ox" data-source="post: 3460029" data-attributes="member: 48469">It&#039;s OK to reevaluate your opinion of someone you formerly respected if their professed beliefs and behavior change. Trump&#039;s did, in a big way. So what&#039;s the problem? Defending anybody whose personal lawyer just had 3 simultaneous no knock raids conducted against them due to an apparent mountain of evidence that triggered the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege is the ultimate form of butt kissing. And I&#039;m sorry, but I couldn&#039;t defend any Democrat whose Democrat-appointed justice system had seen the kind of evidence needed to green-light that action. If the FBI is walking through your lawyer&#039;s doors unannounced, you&#039;re probably guilty as <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/group1/censored2.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":censored2:" title="Censored2&nbsp; &nbsp; :censored2:" data-shortname=":censored2:" />. It&#039;s just not a defensible position regardless of your party affiliation.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Box Ox, post: 3460029, member: 48469"] It's OK to reevaluate your opinion of someone you formerly respected if their professed beliefs and behavior change. Trump's did, in a big way. So what's the problem? Defending anybody whose personal lawyer just had 3 simultaneous no knock raids conducted against them due to an apparent mountain of evidence that triggered the crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege is the ultimate form of butt kissing. And I'm sorry, but I couldn't defend any Democrat whose Democrat-appointed justice system had seen the kind of evidence needed to green-light that action. If the FBI is walking through your lawyer's doors unannounced, you're probably guilty as :censored:. It's just not a defensible position regardless of your party affiliation. [/QUOTE]

Verification