Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3506010" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>I&#039;m saying it came out he approached a bunch of corporations saying he had special access to the President and could do a better job than lobbyists getting things done for them.&nbsp; The corporations are saying he said this.&nbsp; You don&#039;t put someone on trial for things they might do in the future.&nbsp; You put them on trial for what they&#039;re accused of now.&nbsp; Of course the Press is going to run with this.&nbsp; There was excitement that this somehow tied Trump to a Russian bigwig.&nbsp; Thought they had the smoking gun.&nbsp; Doesn&#039;t absolve Cohen just because they got that wrong.&nbsp; It may very well be nothing happens to Cohen because it might expose too much the kind of deals that are commonplace in Washington.&nbsp; But it&#039;s sleazy to trade on your position whether it&#039;s a fixer or a Secretary of State.&nbsp; I worked for hourly wages.&nbsp; Aren&#039;t the fat salaries these people make enough?</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3506010, member: 24302"] I'm saying it came out he approached a bunch of corporations saying he had special access to the President and could do a better job than lobbyists getting things done for them. The corporations are saying he said this. You don't put someone on trial for things they might do in the future. You put them on trial for what they're accused of now. Of course the Press is going to run with this. There was excitement that this somehow tied Trump to a Russian bigwig. Thought they had the smoking gun. Doesn't absolve Cohen just because they got that wrong. It may very well be nothing happens to Cohen because it might expose too much the kind of deals that are commonplace in Washington. But it's sleazy to trade on your position whether it's a fixer or a Secretary of State. I worked for hourly wages. Aren't the fat salaries these people make enough? [/QUOTE]

Verification