Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="floridays" data-source="post: 4196429" data-attributes="member: 68849">Under Roe they aren&#039;t, they are merely a &quot;choice.&quot;Scientifically, exactly what are these human babies?I supplied your answer.I can&#039;t speak for nine black robes and former and current &quot;well meaning&quot; individuals that bastardize the meaning of the 14th Amendment.I do however understand exactly why the left aligns with the precise wording (in this instance) and not the reconstruction era intent.It is clear the intent was to grant ALL SLAVES citizenship, nothing more, nothing less, and be counted as full, not 2/3 for the purposes of apportioning representation of states in the federal government.It&#039;s not my fault nine black robes, have mangled the intent of the amendment.If you desire to play the word for word game, I welcome it.I&#039;ll play the precise wording game any day with anyone, Constitutionally speaking.Bring your best, Sam and anyone else, form a line.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="floridays, post: 4196429, member: 68849"] Under Roe they aren't, they are merely a "choice." Scientifically, exactly what are these human babies? I supplied your answer. I can't speak for nine black robes and former and current "well meaning" individuals that bastardize the meaning of the 14th Amendment. I do however understand exactly why the left aligns with the precise wording (in this instance) and not the reconstruction era intent. It is clear the intent was to grant ALL SLAVES citizenship, nothing more, nothing less, and be counted as full, not 2/3 for the purposes of apportioning representation of states in the federal government. It's not my fault nine black robes, have mangled the intent of the amendment. If you desire to play the word for word game, I welcome it. I'll play the precise wording game any day with anyone, Constitutionally speaking. Bring your best, Sam and anyone else, form a line. [/QUOTE]

Verification