Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BrownSuit" data-source="post: 460597" data-attributes="member: 14437">Actually, I think it does. Red and other&#039;s point here was that the Center Manager and Management team were gunning for the driver&#039;s job because of his union involvement, not because of production numbers.We&#039;ve tossed around the production numbers and most in the last page or two have agreed that to be consistently missing that much SPOHR something was seriously wrong or the SPOHR was set wrong in part because the center was gunning for him. We&#039;ve also found out the driver is running the same SPOHR as over two years ago, despite improvements in route management PAS/EDD, and the likelihood that the route has become denser during that time. So the only thing left is that they really were gunning for him. Well by bringing somebody in from another Center, that likely doesn&#039;t know the guy and could care less one way or another, it is impartial. The chances are getting smaller that s/he would have been &quot;tainted&quot; by management out to &quot;get the guy&quot; because of his union involvement. So basically we are left with the same question, what is really going on here? It&#039;s not production, that&#039;s for sure, the numbers should be up at least slightly from over two years ago, and the fact that the Sup was from another center, takes away the likelihood they wanted this guy canned. He should have been fairly impartial since he likely didn&#039;t know the guy and didn&#039;t have to deal with the center manager.Do we know how many days he was down by 3? It sounded like it had become a regular occurrence.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BrownSuit, post: 460597, member: 14437"] Actually, I think it does. Red and other's point here was that the Center Manager and Management team were gunning for the driver's job because of his union involvement, not because of production numbers. We've tossed around the production numbers and most in the last page or two have agreed that to be consistently missing that much SPOHR something was seriously wrong or the SPOHR was set wrong in part because the center was gunning for him. We've also found out the driver is running the same SPOHR as over two years ago, despite improvements in route management PAS/EDD, and the likelihood that the route has become denser during that time. So the only thing left is that they really were gunning for him. Well by bringing somebody in from another Center, that likely doesn't know the guy and could care less one way or another, it is impartial. The chances are getting smaller that s/he would have been "tainted" by management out to "get the guy" because of his union involvement. So basically we are left with the same question, what is really going on here? It's not production, that's for sure, the numbers should be up at least slightly from over two years ago, and the fact that the Sup was from another center, takes away the likelihood they wanted this guy canned. He should have been fairly impartial since he likely didn't know the guy and didn't have to deal with the center manager. Do we know how many days he was down by 3? It sounded like it had become a regular occurrence. [/QUOTE]

Verification