Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Omega man" data-source="post: 461440" data-attributes="member: 19470">You are wrong. I am not saying that the over/under system as it currently is applied is fair. What I am saying is that if implemented properly and giving fair allowances for everything that occurs in our day, it at least gives credit for the variables in our day. SPORH does not. The gauge should be consistency in the over/under, not maintaining under plan. You expect a driver to maintain a certain level a performance even though a driver may do very different things from day to day. For example, one day a driver may run a 15 SPORH on a light piece count day and a 13 SPORH on the next day when 2 of his business stops get 100 pieces each. In your eyes he would be slacking off but he very well may have had consistent over plan on both days. This is why SPORH cannot be used as the gauge. Also, averaging SPORH over only 3 days is too small of a sample to judge performance.&nbsp; 3 days divided by the 261 days each year we work equates to .011 percent. That means you are gauging a drivers performance based only on what he has demonstrated .011 percent of the time. Statistically you would be called a fool. Stop trying to give credibility to what UPS is doing when it is blatantly unfair. UPS currently has no fair gauge for performance. They have done it to themselves by not giving us a realistic over\under system. Don’t accept SPORH as a “lock in” as some of have described. Force UPS to use a fair over\under system that incorporates everything that we do. Then only accept consistency as your gauge.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Omega man, post: 461440, member: 19470"] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]You are wrong. I am not saying that the over/under system as it currently is applied is fair. What I am saying is that if implemented properly and giving fair allowances for everything that occurs in our day, it at least gives credit for the variables in our day. SPORH does not. The gauge should be consistency in the over/under, not maintaining under plan. You expect a driver to maintain a certain level a performance even though a driver may do very different things from day to day. For example, one day a driver may run a 15 SPORH on a light piece count day and a 13 SPORH on the next day when 2 of his business stops get 100 pieces each. In your eyes he would be slacking off but he very well may have had consistent over plan on both days. This is why SPORH cannot be used as the gauge. Also, averaging SPORH over only 3 days is too small of a sample to judge performance. 3 days divided by the 261 days each year we work equates to .011 percent. That means you are gauging a drivers performance based only on what he has demonstrated .011 percent of the time. Statistically you would be called a fool. Stop trying to give credibility to what UPS is doing when it is blatantly unfair. [/FONT][/COLOR] [COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]UPS currently has no fair gauge for performance. They have done it to themselves by not giving us a realistic over\under system. Don’t accept SPORH as a “lock in” as some of have described. Force UPS to use a fair over\under system that incorporates everything that we do. Then only accept consistency as your gauge.[/FONT][/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Verification