Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dark_Team_135" data-source="post: 463994" data-attributes="member: 17242">I doubt this is true in every situation: As the NLRB has stated: The relationship at a grievance meeting is not a “master-servant” relationship but a relationship between company advocates on the one side and union advocates on the other side, engaged as equal opposing parties in litigation. In a similar vein, the US Supreme Court has said the National Labor Relations Act contemplates robust debate and gives a union license to use intemperate, abusive, or insulting language without fear of restraint or penalty if it believes such rhetoric to be an effective means to make its point.</blockquote>