Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
QPR 2010 / MIS 2011 Any Insight into Merit Increases?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FracusBrown" data-source="post: 812356" data-attributes="member: 29360"><p>I find it very disturbing that this plan in in place and I have learned more about it here than I have leaned from my alleged leaders. </p><p> </p><p>I am also very disturbed at how the QPR process has been handled. In my area, the elements and goals are entered haphazardly to satisfy the requirement of getting them approved by the deadline. The elements are randomly selected, goals are arbitrarily established and the results reported vary from accurate to miscalculated to completely false. Then the day of the deadline the non-sense gets approved without even doing a basic logic check. The result is a completely useless and unfair evaluation. It makes me ill to think these will be used to establish pay and band levels. </p><p> </p><p>Assuming this all gets cleared up, there is another concern or conflict I anticipate. If one truly focuses on the stated goals and dismisses other items, there's going to be a conflict. Cost is the best example. If expense is the first priority in every decision as expected, will others accept that cost does not allow for their expectations to be met? If there are 12-16 stated goals, and pay and rank is based upon achieving them and them only, the rest of the non-stated expectations are going to become an issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FracusBrown, post: 812356, member: 29360"] I find it very disturbing that this plan in in place and I have learned more about it here than I have leaned from my alleged leaders. I am also very disturbed at how the QPR process has been handled. In my area, the elements and goals are entered haphazardly to satisfy the requirement of getting them approved by the deadline. The elements are randomly selected, goals are arbitrarily established and the results reported vary from accurate to miscalculated to completely false. Then the day of the deadline the non-sense gets approved without even doing a basic logic check. The result is a completely useless and unfair evaluation. It makes me ill to think these will be used to establish pay and band levels. Assuming this all gets cleared up, there is another concern or conflict I anticipate. If one truly focuses on the stated goals and dismisses other items, there's going to be a conflict. Cost is the best example. If expense is the first priority in every decision as expected, will others accept that cost does not allow for their expectations to be met? If there are 12-16 stated goals, and pay and rank is based upon achieving them and them only, the rest of the non-stated expectations are going to become an issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
QPR 2010 / MIS 2011 Any Insight into Merit Increases?
Top