Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
QPR 2010 / MIS 2011 Any Insight into Merit Increases?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pretzel_man" data-source="post: 814293" data-attributes="member: 927"><p>Actually, I think it shows that coming up with measureable, meaningful goals for every individual in the company is not possible.</p><p> </p><p>People complained that the QPR process didn't reflect how well they actually did. Now, the true QPR score is solely your manager's subjective rating. Personally, I would much rather my manager's opinion was the score, and not it be based on a number that I personally may have or have not influenced.</p><p> </p><p>In the old model, I never cared about the overall score, I only cared about the 360 ratings from my manager and peers. Those "subjective" ratings were much more important to me than a change in NDPPH which could have been caused by many things.</p><p> </p><p>So, today, I have the numerical goals and my manager can rate me higher or lower than what those numbers show. I find the current method producing a more reflective score than before.</p><p> </p><p>Of course, people will now say that it is too subjective.... Its 100% subjective now. I find that better</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pretzel_man, post: 814293, member: 927"] Actually, I think it shows that coming up with measureable, meaningful goals for every individual in the company is not possible. People complained that the QPR process didn't reflect how well they actually did. Now, the true QPR score is solely your manager's subjective rating. Personally, I would much rather my manager's opinion was the score, and not it be based on a number that I personally may have or have not influenced. In the old model, I never cared about the overall score, I only cared about the 360 ratings from my manager and peers. Those "subjective" ratings were much more important to me than a change in NDPPH which could have been caused by many things. So, today, I have the numerical goals and my manager can rate me higher or lower than what those numbers show. I find the current method producing a more reflective score than before. Of course, people will now say that it is too subjective.... Its 100% subjective now. I find that better [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
QPR 2010 / MIS 2011 Any Insight into Merit Increases?
Top