Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
QPR 2010 / MIS 2011 Any Insight into Merit Increases?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FracusBrown" data-source="post: 817948" data-attributes="member: 29360"><p>There may be some minor changes in functionality. The allotment and dispersement of the funds remains unchanged. The evaluator enters the increase percentage <em>at will</em> from the alloted funds??? </p><p> </p><p>Currently QPR is utterly subjective, and then the pay is determined by another entirely subjective process. Not what was anticipated, but no more inferior than by means of the pathetic QPR course of action. </p><p> </p><p>People meetings? The necessity seems to have vanished in the last round of consolidations. Secret now??? What would be decided??? Bands??? </p><p> </p><p>Bands are no secret and the pay for performance issue is lurking. Perhaps adjustments are in store for the upcoming period. </p><p> </p><p>So far, QPR seems the same. My elements, bases and goals were approved long ago. Since they are significantly inconsistent what that of even my closest peers, it's gong to be somewhat difficult to use these for any consistent non-subjective ratings of rankings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FracusBrown, post: 817948, member: 29360"] There may be some minor changes in functionality. The allotment and dispersement of the funds remains unchanged. The evaluator enters the increase percentage [I]at will[/I] from the alloted funds??? Currently QPR is utterly subjective, and then the pay is determined by another entirely subjective process. Not what was anticipated, but no more inferior than by means of the pathetic QPR course of action. People meetings? The necessity seems to have vanished in the last round of consolidations. Secret now??? What would be decided??? Bands??? Bands are no secret and the pay for performance issue is lurking. Perhaps adjustments are in store for the upcoming period. So far, QPR seems the same. My elements, bases and goals were approved long ago. Since they are significantly inconsistent what that of even my closest peers, it's gong to be somewhat difficult to use these for any consistent non-subjective ratings of rankings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Partners
QPR 2010 / MIS 2011 Any Insight into Merit Increases?
Top