Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="duker333" data-source="post: 51849">I&#039;ll tell what I have a problem with... this change to me at least gives &gt;insight to how the management committee addresses its priorities ... change &gt;to the MIP such as this is the foremost thing they speak to??????.....how &gt;about changing the pension plan so we don&#039;t have to work 35 years to retire; &gt;how about giving ample staffing to the package operations that now have a friend/t &gt;ratio to hourly of 37:1, and when one of the 2 supervisors is on vacation the &gt;sole supervisor is working 15 hours;, how about not expecting no excess &gt;overtime to an OMS who has to cover vacation for another that is out;, how &gt;about a little.... just a very little explanation on how these &quot;stretch &gt;goals/gains from PAS &quot; were arrived at or how the braintrust calculated &gt;everyone to gain to the same extent; how about putting all the things we in &gt;package are asked to do everyday...from 110 e-mails, churnscope visits, &gt;safety observation, train drivers, OJS drivers, be on conference calls, &gt;answer to every staff operation for there compliance items, be in on the &gt;preload and then do check-ins at night and simply run the biggest part of our &gt;business everyday....I could go on for a week ....but why bother.......My &gt;leadership thinks above all this they need to make this change......If the &gt;job was just a little more reasonable and paid us fairly for what we do, they &gt;wouldn&#039;t need to worry about the up and coming generation flipping their &gt;stock, they would be a committed and loyal group that wouldn&#039;t dare sell &gt;their shares.&nbsp; But I know the common response to comments like mine are to &gt;quit..... the leaders in this company have an obligation to hear these &gt;concerns and do something.&nbsp; Last word on this MIP change ....if they put the &gt;change out for a vote....without the Annie Casey Foundation shares being &gt;voted would the change pass a shareholder vote.........no way!!!!!!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="duker333, post: 51849"] I'll tell what I have a problem with... this change to me at least gives >insight to how the management committee addresses its priorities ... change >to the MIP such as this is the foremost thing they speak to??????.....how >about changing the pension plan so we don't have to work 35 years to retire; >how about giving ample staffing to the package operations that now have a friend/t >ratio to hourly of 37:1, and when one of the 2 supervisors is on vacation the >sole supervisor is working 15 hours;, how about not expecting no excess >overtime to an OMS who has to cover vacation for another that is out;, how >about a little.... just a very little explanation on how these "stretch >goals/gains from PAS " were arrived at or how the braintrust calculated >everyone to gain to the same extent; how about putting all the things we in >package are asked to do everyday...from 110 e-mails, churnscope visits, >safety observation, train drivers, OJS drivers, be on conference calls, >answer to every staff operation for there compliance items, be in on the >preload and then do check-ins at night and simply run the biggest part of our >business everyday....I could go on for a week ....but why bother.......My >leadership thinks above all this they need to make this change......If the >job was just a little more reasonable and paid us fairly for what we do, they >wouldn't need to worry about the up and coming generation flipping their >stock, they would be a committed and loyal group that wouldn't dare sell >their shares. But I know the common response to comments like mine are to >quit..... the leaders in this company have an obligation to hear these >concerns and do something. Last word on this MIP change ....if they put the >change out for a vote....without the Annie Casey Foundation shares being >voted would the change pass a shareholder vote.........no way!!!!!! [/QUOTE]

Verification