Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
religion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BrownFlush" data-source="post: 6069858" data-attributes="member: 65823"><p>No you didn't. You danced all around it.</p><p></p><p>So, if you see and recognize a passage in scripture that refutes a doctrine(teaching )no matter the subject, you believe, you will not change/admit your belief/conviction was wrong, because Bible Scholars spend lifetimes studying the Bible and you're going with them? The scripture was written for common people to understand and come to clear conclusions. Not division.</p><p></p><p>If Matthew 24:34 does not destroy your belief or at least make you begin to think the doctrine of premillennialism is wrong, then either there are 2000 year old people walking around or the Jesus came back and we missed it.( which will be impossible)</p><p></p><p>Everything before verse 34 in Matthew 24 is talking about the destruction of Jerusalem. You said:</p><p></p><p>"And Elijah came near to all the people and said, “How long will you go limping between two different opinions?" -1 Kings 18:21 </p><p></p><p>Yes, be ready at all times. For the second coming. This is the teaching that begins in verse 36. Not in verse 3. Why? Because unlike the destruction of Jerusalem, there will be no warnings, no signs.</p><p>The signs and warnings that were to portend the fall of Jerusalem have universally been taken by premillennialists as being the identifying marks of the "end time." For some reason, eschatology holds a fatal fascination for those "scholars".</p><p> In every book that comes off the presses from the hand of a self-styled "prophecy expert" you will find numerous references to Matthew 24 that are wrong. Like you, they always fail to acknowledge the transition verse.</p><p></p><p>You say what difference does it make? One of a zillion different false teachings of the doctrine is that we all will get a second chance. Uh-Oh...When Jesus comes he will take vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ (2 Thess. 1:8). </p><p>Peter says the physical universe will be torched when the Lord returns and Paul says Jesus will not set foot on the earth again. Judgement day will begin.</p><p>You can't have it both ways.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BrownFlush, post: 6069858, member: 65823"] No you didn't. You danced all around it. So, if you see and recognize a passage in scripture that refutes a doctrine(teaching )no matter the subject, you believe, you will not change/admit your belief/conviction was wrong, because Bible Scholars spend lifetimes studying the Bible and you're going with them? The scripture was written for common people to understand and come to clear conclusions. Not division. If Matthew 24:34 does not destroy your belief or at least make you begin to think the doctrine of premillennialism is wrong, then either there are 2000 year old people walking around or the Jesus came back and we missed it.( which will be impossible) Everything before verse 34 in Matthew 24 is talking about the destruction of Jerusalem. You said: "And Elijah came near to all the people and said, “How long will you go limping between two different opinions?" -1 Kings 18:21 Yes, be ready at all times. For the second coming. This is the teaching that begins in verse 36. Not in verse 3. Why? Because unlike the destruction of Jerusalem, there will be no warnings, no signs. The signs and warnings that were to portend the fall of Jerusalem have universally been taken by premillennialists as being the identifying marks of the "end time." For some reason, eschatology holds a fatal fascination for those "scholars". In every book that comes off the presses from the hand of a self-styled "prophecy expert" you will find numerous references to Matthew 24 that are wrong. Like you, they always fail to acknowledge the transition verse. You say what difference does it make? One of a zillion different false teachings of the doctrine is that we all will get a second chance. Uh-Oh...When Jesus comes he will take vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ (2 Thess. 1:8). Peter says the physical universe will be torched when the Lord returns and Paul says Jesus will not set foot on the earth again. Judgement day will begin. You can't have it both ways. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
religion
Top