Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
REPARATIONS HEARINGS! FREE STUFF?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigJamesBrown" data-source="post: 4117574" data-attributes="member: 72397"><p>It's great that you are starting to realize that the Ashkenazi people cannot be the the people of the book no matter that they have taking over the Holy Land and confessed to be the people of the book. Now I'm going to tell you you are now actually going in the right direction oh, so let's just say you eliminate the Jewish people of the world as being the chosen people of the Bible. Now let's look at the Arabs which have been in that land for thousands of years, can you see how that alone is a problem all within itself? Let's use some critical thinking and go to the curse of Deuteronomy, that's right the Arabs don't fit the curse at all. As a matter of fact we know that the Arabs also enslaved the Hebrews which they took for a possession to their own land. So basically we're running out of options here, we know the Ashkenazi and all japhetic people don't have the DNA that Stacks up as being the Hebrew Israelites, we also know that the Arabs being of Semitic stock don't fit the curses of the book; and we know that ham is the pro generator of the dark races the Africans, not the Negroes! (DNA proves this as well) the only question that's left is where did the Negro come from? We know he's not on hamite from the son of ham, we also know that he is not Japhethic, Turks Russian French polish German British khazars Ashkenazi etc etc. We are running out of options to figure out where the Negro comes from if and I say if you say he is not of shemitic stock, which can't be denied based on the migration of his a1b1a chromosomes.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigJamesBrown, post: 4117574, member: 72397"] It's great that you are starting to realize that the Ashkenazi people cannot be the the people of the book no matter that they have taking over the Holy Land and confessed to be the people of the book. Now I'm going to tell you you are now actually going in the right direction oh, so let's just say you eliminate the Jewish people of the world as being the chosen people of the Bible. Now let's look at the Arabs which have been in that land for thousands of years, can you see how that alone is a problem all within itself? Let's use some critical thinking and go to the curse of Deuteronomy, that's right the Arabs don't fit the curse at all. As a matter of fact we know that the Arabs also enslaved the Hebrews which they took for a possession to their own land. So basically we're running out of options here, we know the Ashkenazi and all japhetic people don't have the DNA that Stacks up as being the Hebrew Israelites, we also know that the Arabs being of Semitic stock don't fit the curses of the book; and we know that ham is the pro generator of the dark races the Africans, not the Negroes! (DNA proves this as well) the only question that's left is where did the Negro come from? We know he's not on hamite from the son of ham, we also know that he is not Japhethic, Turks Russian French polish German British khazars Ashkenazi etc etc. We are running out of options to figure out where the Negro comes from if and I say if you say he is not of shemitic stock, which can't be denied based on the migration of his a1b1a chromosomes. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
REPARATIONS HEARINGS! FREE STUFF?
Top