Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
Retirees: What Are The Expenses You Didn't Count On For Retirement?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="beentheredonethat" data-source="post: 1358124" data-attributes="member: 4886"><p>I get your upset, but with any contract their are negotiations by both sides. The teamsters supported and voted on this contract and the master passed. Whenever mgmt complains about a portion of the contract, it's pretty unanimous that the teamsters say that "UPS signed it or UPS agreed to the contract". Why isn't this true in the reverse? Why aren't you upset with the teamsters and not UPS. We all know, there is a certain amount of money available and the decision is mainly how to divide it up and to an extent can more money be available. I'm sure if the teamsters proposed lower wages or even high insurance costs for actives UPS would take on more cost for retirees if it was cost neutral. But that's not what the active teamsters negotiated and voted on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="beentheredonethat, post: 1358124, member: 4886"] I get your upset, but with any contract their are negotiations by both sides. The teamsters supported and voted on this contract and the master passed. Whenever mgmt complains about a portion of the contract, it's pretty unanimous that the teamsters say that "UPS signed it or UPS agreed to the contract". Why isn't this true in the reverse? Why aren't you upset with the teamsters and not UPS. We all know, there is a certain amount of money available and the decision is mainly how to divide it up and to an extent can more money be available. I'm sure if the teamsters proposed lower wages or even high insurance costs for actives UPS would take on more cost for retirees if it was cost neutral. But that's not what the active teamsters negotiated and voted on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Retirement Topics
Retirees: What Are The Expenses You Didn't Count On For Retirement?
Top