Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Romney "Surrender Speech"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 300382" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>You know Brett, on the one hand I can appreciate some of what you say. I too think of gov't in vastly smaller sizes as yourself and I'd bet in ways even smaller that yourself but your point is well taken. I'd throw AV in here as well if he doesn't mind because he also has expressed ideas of smaller gov't. As it pertains to those issues and the choice you will most likely face come Nov. as a voter of those ideals, you my friend IMO missed the very chance to actually vote for someone who was for that and more. And yes I'm gonna say Ron Paul. I'm sure in return you will fire back, but the war on terror and his stance on the use of the miltary.</p><p></p><p>This situation has been a result of a good job by the media or I should say party lackees and a bad job by the Ron Paul campaign and I think the Paul campaign gets the bulk of the blame. The media plays along because in effect they're partners in crime for not doing their job as neutral media running up to the war itself.</p><p></p><p>First off, contary to myth, Ron voted to authorize Afghanistan but he went one step further using US Constitution, Art. 1 Sec. 8 with Letters of Marque and Reprisal. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130903142059/http://www.progress.org/archive/fold232.htm" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20130903142059/http://www.progress.org/archive/fold232.htm</a> and <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20080409135228/http://www.house.gov/paul/press/press2001/pr101101.htm" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20080409135228/http://www.house.gov/paul/press/press2001/pr101101.htm</a></p><p></p><p>Now for guys like yourself and AV who love the idea of privatization, you should be all over this idea. How does this work with Ron? Take 2 plus minutes and watch this!</p><p></p><p>[media=youtube]YSP9NteApqI[/media]</p><p>Ron Paul on Letters of Marque and Reprisal</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying this resolves everything in your mind or in AV's and it may not answer every question either but from many of your own POV's, his idea to battle global terrorism squares very much with many ideas of your own at least from my POV in reading your many posts!</p><p></p><p>What is Letter of Marque?</p><p><a href="http://www.answers.com/topic/letter-of-marque" target="_blank">http://www.answers.com/topic/letter-of-marque</a></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_marque" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_marque</a></p><p></p><p>Not definative by any means but rather a quick peak as an intro to the concept.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 300382, member: 2189"] You know Brett, on the one hand I can appreciate some of what you say. I too think of gov't in vastly smaller sizes as yourself and I'd bet in ways even smaller that yourself but your point is well taken. I'd throw AV in here as well if he doesn't mind because he also has expressed ideas of smaller gov't. As it pertains to those issues and the choice you will most likely face come Nov. as a voter of those ideals, you my friend IMO missed the very chance to actually vote for someone who was for that and more. And yes I'm gonna say Ron Paul. I'm sure in return you will fire back, but the war on terror and his stance on the use of the miltary. This situation has been a result of a good job by the media or I should say party lackees and a bad job by the Ron Paul campaign and I think the Paul campaign gets the bulk of the blame. The media plays along because in effect they're partners in crime for not doing their job as neutral media running up to the war itself. First off, contary to myth, Ron voted to authorize Afghanistan but he went one step further using US Constitution, Art. 1 Sec. 8 with Letters of Marque and Reprisal. [URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20130903142059/http://www.progress.org/archive/fold232.htm[/URL] and [URL]https://web.archive.org/web/20080409135228/http://www.house.gov/paul/press/press2001/pr101101.htm[/URL] Now for guys like yourself and AV who love the idea of privatization, you should be all over this idea. How does this work with Ron? Take 2 plus minutes and watch this! [media=youtube]YSP9NteApqI[/media] Ron Paul on Letters of Marque and Reprisal I'm not saying this resolves everything in your mind or in AV's and it may not answer every question either but from many of your own POV's, his idea to battle global terrorism squares very much with many ideas of your own at least from my POV in reading your many posts! What is Letter of Marque? [URL]http://www.answers.com/topic/letter-of-marque[/URL] [URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_of_marque[/URL] Not definative by any means but rather a quick peak as an intro to the concept. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Romney "Surrender Speech"
Top