Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ron Paul and the risks of being uninsured hit close to home!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="The Other Side" data-source="post: 878314" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>No, i think its YOU that needs to clarify your understanding. Goverment has many ranks. There is federal, state, local and municipalities. These are ALL GOVERMENT moreluck. Each of these goverment bodies makes laws and policies for its people.</p><p></p><p>The State goverment forcing me to BUY car insurance against my will or home owners insurance against my will is a violation of the consitution if we accept your argument that health care in the form of the health reform act is a violation of the constitution. </p><p></p><p>We all use the same constitution moreluck. There isnt a separate document for states.</p><p></p><p>As Klein stated, deductions out of my paycheck for things I dont want or need should be an OPTION, not forced upon me by the goverment if we accept your argument. Why take out SS and Disability out of my check if I dont plan on being injured? or I invest privately in my retirement? Why should I be FORCED by the goverment to pay for these things?</p><p></p><p>They should be ruled unconstitutional as well if we accept your argument on health care.</p><p></p><p>If the supreme court rules that the "goverment" (which will include, fed, state, local) cannot force you to buy a service, then there will be a rush to force all the laws for car insurance, and home insurance out the window.</p><p></p><p>Then where would you be? Sitting in your foreign car waiting to be creamed by some uninsured driver?</p><p></p><p>You cant have it both ways moreluck. Goverment is goverment.</p><p></p><p>There is no separation, except in the political arena of nonsense.</p><p></p><p>peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="The Other Side, post: 878314, member: 17969"] No, i think its YOU that needs to clarify your understanding. Goverment has many ranks. There is federal, state, local and municipalities. These are ALL GOVERMENT moreluck. Each of these goverment bodies makes laws and policies for its people. The State goverment forcing me to BUY car insurance against my will or home owners insurance against my will is a violation of the consitution if we accept your argument that health care in the form of the health reform act is a violation of the constitution. We all use the same constitution moreluck. There isnt a separate document for states. As Klein stated, deductions out of my paycheck for things I dont want or need should be an OPTION, not forced upon me by the goverment if we accept your argument. Why take out SS and Disability out of my check if I dont plan on being injured? or I invest privately in my retirement? Why should I be FORCED by the goverment to pay for these things? They should be ruled unconstitutional as well if we accept your argument on health care. If the supreme court rules that the "goverment" (which will include, fed, state, local) cannot force you to buy a service, then there will be a rush to force all the laws for car insurance, and home insurance out the window. Then where would you be? Sitting in your foreign car waiting to be creamed by some uninsured driver? You cant have it both ways moreluck. Goverment is goverment. There is no separation, except in the political arena of nonsense. peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Ron Paul and the risks of being uninsured hit close to home!
Top