I am also curious as to the outcome, Sober. You are in Western Conference as I am. The outcome may impact us, though at this moment I don't know what my Southwest riders say.
The relevant language is in Art 6 Section 2 of the Western Region Supplement, the pertininent part of which I quote..
"....
a permanent vacancy shall be described as an area that is delivered three (3) days a week for a thirty (30) day period, excluding extra areas established during peak season....
....
When a drivers assigned delivery area is permanently changed by fifty percent (50%) or more of its delivery stops, said driver shall have the right to follow the major portion of the delivery area. When more than one (1) driver's delivery area is affected, those affected drivers shall be afforded the opportunity amongst themselves to bid the areas affected in accordance with their seniority."
My bid route has been "
permanently" eliminated for an average of 3 days a week over the last 30 days. Therefore, the bid drivers of the individual routes that have been "affected" by absorbing my work, along with myself, will re-bid those routes amongst ourselves in seniority order.
The
only people affected are those who run the routes that my work is being given to. In my case, we have 7 bid drivers with a total of 6 "permanent" routes between them. I am 3rd in seniority among the 7 drivers, and its
my route that is getting cut out, so the end result when we are done bidding amongst ourselves is that someone with less seniority than me will wind up being the one without a route.
I dont see how this would affect any other centers or parts of the country. If you are in the Western Region, you are protected under the same language.