Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bacha29" data-source="post: 4849234" data-attributes="member: 58386"><p>Remember RG TOLD them that it was property of Hunter Biden. Right away it fell outside the narrow focus and limitations spelled out in the warrant and simply by telling them that it was Hunter Biden's personal property it immediately was rejected by the FBI. Now perhaps if RG new enough to keep his mouth shut for once and simply let them include Biden's hard drive in along with the rest of the evidence collected not knowing that it was Biden's even then it couldn't have been used in any prosecution because it would have been obtained illegally if it was not specifically listed in the warrant So just what the hell is your point?</p></blockquote><p></p>