Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Sandy Pope, Hoffa or Gegare Fix My 22.3 Job and YOU Have My Vote!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JonFrum" data-source="post: 880521" data-attributes="member: 18044"><p>The "Yes" voters deleated most of the Article 22.3 Contract language, so there is no longer a specific requirement that combo jobs have two roughly equal segments. However, the Union <u>should</u> want to keep the distinction, and vote to retain it in grievance and panel hearings.</p><p></p><p>When the 22.3 jobs were initially created in April of 2000, there was a lot of talk about a "easy/hard" rule, as if this was an eleventh commandment. No one had heard of it before that. And it wasn't in the Contract. But it was spread, and taken as a "given." Why don't you try filing a grievance if an Inside/Inside job doesn't have a so-called "easy" segment.</p><p></p><p>You could also file citing Article 47 of the New England Supplement based on Maintenance Of Standards and Protection of Conditions. As well as the labor relations doctrine of Past Practice.</p><p></p><p>And finally, Article 22.3 says a list of all 22.3 jobs should have been sent to the International by UPS in February of 2008. File to see if the altered jobs were specifically listed as jobs to be preserved. (I assume they were if they have lasted this long.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JonFrum, post: 880521, member: 18044"] The "Yes" voters deleated most of the Article 22.3 Contract language, so there is no longer a specific requirement that combo jobs have two roughly equal segments. However, the Union [U]should[/U] want to keep the distinction, and vote to retain it in grievance and panel hearings. When the 22.3 jobs were initially created in April of 2000, there was a lot of talk about a "easy/hard" rule, as if this was an eleventh commandment. No one had heard of it before that. And it wasn't in the Contract. But it was spread, and taken as a "given." Why don't you try filing a grievance if an Inside/Inside job doesn't have a so-called "easy" segment. You could also file citing Article 47 of the New England Supplement based on Maintenance Of Standards and Protection of Conditions. As well as the labor relations doctrine of Past Practice. And finally, Article 22.3 says a list of all 22.3 jobs should have been sent to the International by UPS in February of 2008. File to see if the altered jobs were specifically listed as jobs to be preserved. (I assume they were if they have lasted this long.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Sandy Pope, Hoffa or Gegare Fix My 22.3 Job and YOU Have My Vote!
Top