Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
SCOTUS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Old Man Jingles" data-source="post: 4529021" data-attributes="member: 18222"><p>Thomas, Aleto and Kavanaugh voted against this ruling.</p><p></p><p>I don't hold it against them ... their dissent was based on the fact that this is essentially writing law from the bench.</p><p>Their contention is that Congress should do their job (good luck on that!!!) and pass a law that defines these inclusions.</p><p>This ruling passed today is a landmark case that only changes laws in 17 states as the other 33 states already have this as a law, passed by their legislatures.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Old Man Jingles, post: 4529021, member: 18222"] Thomas, Aleto and Kavanaugh voted against this ruling. I don't hold it against them ... their dissent was based on the fact that this is essentially writing law from the bench. Their contention is that Congress should do their job (good luck on that!!!) and pass a law that defines these inclusions. This ruling passed today is a landmark case that only changes laws in 17 states as the other 33 states already have this as a law, passed by their legislatures. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
SCOTUS
Top