Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Second Amendment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brett636" data-source="post: 442990" data-attributes="member: 249"><p>oh, this is good stuff. You can continue to argue your BS point all you want, but the bottom line is this. </p><p></p><p>Of all the cases to go before the courts regarding the 2nd amendment most of them have concluded the 2nd amendment to be an individual right. Including, but not limited to the following:</p><p></p><p>• Parker vs. D.C., Fed (2007), confirmed an individual right to keep arms and overturning a handgun ban.</p><p>• U.S. vs. Emerson, 5 Fed (1999), confirmed an individual right requiring compelling government interest for regulation.</p><p>• Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 250, 251 (1846) (struck down a ban on sale of small, easily concealed handguns as violating Second Amendment).</p><p>• State v. Chandler, 5 La.An. 489, 490, 491 (1850) (upheld a ban on concealed carry, but acknowledged that open carry was protected by Second Amendment).</p><p>• Smith v. State, 11 La.An. 633, 634 (1856) (upheld a ban on concealed carry, but recognized as protected by Second Amendment "arms there spoken of are such as are borne by a people in war, or at least carried openly").</p><p>• State v. Jumel, 13 La.An. 399, 400 (1858) (upheld a ban on concealed carry, but acknowledged a Second Amendment right to carry openly).</p><p></p><p>Lets not forget the Heller case from this past summer. Everyone whose opinion matters has ruled that you are wrong. Give it up already. The 2nd amendment is an individual right, and nothing you can say will change that fact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brett636, post: 442990, member: 249"] oh, this is good stuff. You can continue to argue your BS point all you want, but the bottom line is this. Of all the cases to go before the courts regarding the 2nd amendment most of them have concluded the 2nd amendment to be an individual right. Including, but not limited to the following: • Parker vs. D.C., Fed (2007), confirmed an individual right to keep arms and overturning a handgun ban. • U.S. vs. Emerson, 5 Fed (1999), confirmed an individual right requiring compelling government interest for regulation. • Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 250, 251 (1846) (struck down a ban on sale of small, easily concealed handguns as violating Second Amendment). • State v. Chandler, 5 La.An. 489, 490, 491 (1850) (upheld a ban on concealed carry, but acknowledged that open carry was protected by Second Amendment). • Smith v. State, 11 La.An. 633, 634 (1856) (upheld a ban on concealed carry, but recognized as protected by Second Amendment "arms there spoken of are such as are borne by a people in war, or at least carried openly"). • State v. Jumel, 13 La.An. 399, 400 (1858) (upheld a ban on concealed carry, but acknowledged a Second Amendment right to carry openly). Lets not forget the Heller case from this past summer. Everyone whose opinion matters has ruled that you are wrong. Give it up already. The 2nd amendment is an individual right, and nothing you can say will change that fact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Second Amendment
Top