Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Second Amendment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wkmac" data-source="post: 444036" data-attributes="member: 2189"><p>Writ filed in the District of Columbia verses Heller with SCOTUS.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.independent.org/pdf/research_articles/2008-03-07_halbrookbrief.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="color: red"><strong>http://www.independent.org/pdf/research_articles/2008-03-07_halbrookbrief.pdf</strong></span></a></p><p> </p><p>The question before the court as per the writ:</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Writ was prepared and written by Stephen P. HalBrook, Phd & J.D. who is also a senior scholar at the Independent Institute </p><p><a href="http://www.independent.org/" target="_blank"><span style="color: red"><strong>http://www.independent.org/</strong></span></a></p><p> </p><p>Another question to ask is this:</p><p> </p><p>If "the people" in the 2nd amendment are not "the people" in a general sense but are in fact a very specific group of people under the name of National Guard or some other regulated conscript with the gov't, then in contextual construction alone, this means "the people" in amendment 1 and amendment 4 is also not a general term but rather applies to a group of privledged citizens as a result of position enjoy these listed rights. Would this mean only members of the national guard being they are the people in the 2nd amendment are also the only ones to enjoy freedom to assemble and then in amendment 4 be secure in their homes and personal effects? I guess freedom of the press only applies to what the gov't mandates as being "of the press" so the more I read the Constitution from Jagger's construct, the more I see an authoriterian nightmare of medieval proportions.</p><p> </p><p>Gee Jagger, and I thought Bush and Company were draconian tyrants but you're actually making them look good after all!</p><p> </p><p><img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/FeltTip/happy-very.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":happy-very:" title="Happy Very :happy-very:" data-shortname=":happy-very:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wkmac, post: 444036, member: 2189"] Writ filed in the District of Columbia verses Heller with SCOTUS. [URL="http://www.independent.org/pdf/research_articles/2008-03-07_halbrookbrief.pdf"][COLOR=red][B]http://www.independent.org/pdf/research_articles/2008-03-07_halbrookbrief.pdf[/B][/COLOR][/URL] The question before the court as per the writ: Writ was prepared and written by Stephen P. HalBrook, Phd & J.D. who is also a senior scholar at the Independent Institute [URL="http://www.independent.org/"][COLOR=red][B]http://www.independent.org/[/B][/COLOR][/URL] Another question to ask is this: If "the people" in the 2nd amendment are not "the people" in a general sense but are in fact a very specific group of people under the name of National Guard or some other regulated conscript with the gov't, then in contextual construction alone, this means "the people" in amendment 1 and amendment 4 is also not a general term but rather applies to a group of privledged citizens as a result of position enjoy these listed rights. Would this mean only members of the national guard being they are the people in the 2nd amendment are also the only ones to enjoy freedom to assemble and then in amendment 4 be secure in their homes and personal effects? I guess freedom of the press only applies to what the gov't mandates as being "of the press" so the more I read the Constitution from Jagger's construct, the more I see an authoriterian nightmare of medieval proportions. Gee Jagger, and I thought Bush and Company were draconian tyrants but you're actually making them look good after all! :happy-very: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Second Amendment
Top