Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Should the Union be FT only?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shift 2" data-source="post: 3569407" data-attributes="member: 73018"><p>I un</p><p> I understand the progression of course you can’t pay some one out the gate or even in the first few years top pay but after the progression is over I dcan my see why they pay some one to do the same job as some one else with maybe a year or 2 less seniority less money because they don’t work a 8 hr day. They already have the advantage of having a full time job and full time pension. Pt 5 yrs and went through ft progression is $30 x 40hrs a week is $1200. Pt 10yrs no progression just GWi is $18 x 20hrs a week is $360. That is rediculous.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shift 2, post: 3569407, member: 73018"] I un I understand the progression of course you can’t pay some one out the gate or even in the first few years top pay but after the progression is over I dcan my see why they pay some one to do the same job as some one else with maybe a year or 2 less seniority less money because they don’t work a 8 hr day. They already have the advantage of having a full time job and full time pension. Pt 5 yrs and went through ft progression is $30 x 40hrs a week is $1200. Pt 10yrs no progression just GWi is $18 x 20hrs a week is $360. That is rediculous. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Should the Union be FT only?
Top