Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Standing Up to the ACLU
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jones" data-source="post: 286319" data-attributes="member: 4805"><p>Hmm, we were talking about state mandated school prayer(at least I was), so I'm not sure why you would pick Stone vs Graham out of the air. The issue in that case was related but not the same, as Kentucky was claiming that the ten commandments were posted for <em>secular</em>, not religious reasons. Abingdon and Engel v Vitale were the cases that you brought up and both dealt directly with state mandated school prayer. 8-1 is about as clear as I would like on that subject, the same as it was in 1948 (Mcollum v Board of education)</p><p></p><p>Did you write the following, or are you quoting someone?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>By the way, if you have any doubts as to how clear a 5-4 decision by the Supreme court is, just ask the president <img src="/community/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>In closing, you might want to double check your new signature</p><p></p><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110709202636/http://factcheck.org/article415.html" target="_blank">Misquoting Lincoln</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jones, post: 286319, member: 4805"] Hmm, we were talking about state mandated school prayer(at least I was), so I'm not sure why you would pick Stone vs Graham out of the air. The issue in that case was related but not the same, as Kentucky was claiming that the ten commandments were posted for [I]secular[/I], not religious reasons. Abingdon and Engel v Vitale were the cases that you brought up and both dealt directly with state mandated school prayer. 8-1 is about as clear as I would like on that subject, the same as it was in 1948 (Mcollum v Board of education) Did you write the following, or are you quoting someone? By the way, if you have any doubts as to how clear a 5-4 decision by the Supreme court is, just ask the president ;) In closing, you might want to double check your new signature [URL='https://web.archive.org/web/20110709202636/http://factcheck.org/article415.html']Misquoting Lincoln[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Standing Up to the ACLU
Top