Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Macbrother" data-source="post: 4774502" data-attributes="member: 42759">No, but I will give you a few:Bowyer et al. vs Ducey et al.&nbsp; Arizona.&nbsp; Ruling:&nbsp; Fraud allegations vague, implausible.&nbsp; Evidence unreliable or irrelevant.Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar et al.&nbsp; Pennsylvania.&nbsp; Ruling:&nbsp; &quot;This Court has been presented with strainedlegal arguments without merit and speculative accusations unsupported by evidence.&quot;Donald J Trump for President vs Hobbs.&nbsp; Arizona.&nbsp; Trump&#039;s own lawyers admitted affidavits submitted were spam.&nbsp;&nbsp; Under questioning none of the witnesses indicated they had a basis to believe their vote was improperly counted.&nbsp; Case dismissed.Kelly v. Pennsylvania.&nbsp; Concerning the legality of universal mail-in voting, affirmed:&nbsp; &quot;The rationale for the decision was that the Republicans were challenging the law too late; they had been able to challenge the law since it came into force in October 2019, but only filed the lawsuit when the results of the November 2020 election were &quot;becoming seemingly apparent.&quot;Obviously you&#039;re well aware I&#039;m not going to look through and post all 60+ cases - but suffice to say, since the election results were not overturned, it&#039;s safe to assume the rulings did not go in your side&#039;s favor.&nbsp; However you&#039;re free to rebut me with any cases of your own where fraud or unconstitutionality are proven.The United States Judiciary branch uniformly and decisively rejected your camp&#039;s claims of fraud and illegality.&nbsp; Period.&nbsp; Cry to your friends, blame the media if you like, but that will do nothing to change the facts:&nbsp; Trump got his fanny spanked.&nbsp; Not only that, his incompetence cost him the house in 2018, and the Senate in 2020.&nbsp; Great legacy, indeed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Macbrother, post: 4774502, member: 42759"] No, but I will give you a few: [I][I]Bowyer et al. vs Ducey et al. [/I][/I]Arizona. Ruling: Fraud allegations vague, implausible. Evidence unreliable or irrelevant. [I]Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar et al. [/I]Pennsylvania. Ruling: "This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations unsupported by evidence." [I]Donald J Trump for President vs Hobbs. [/I]Arizona. Trump's own lawyers admitted affidavits submitted were spam. Under questioning none of the witnesses indicated they had a basis to believe their vote was improperly counted. Case dismissed. [I]Kelly v. Pennsylvania. [/I]Concerning the legality of universal mail-in voting, affirmed: [I]"[/I]The rationale for the decision was that the Republicans were challenging the law too late; they had been able to challenge the law since it came into force in October 2019, but only filed the lawsuit when the results of the November 2020 election were "becoming seemingly apparent." Obviously you're well aware I'm not going to look through and post all 60+ cases - but suffice to say, since the election results were not overturned, it's safe to assume the rulings did not go in your side's favor. However you're free to rebut me with [B]any cases of your own[/B] where fraud or unconstitutionality are [B]proven[/B]. The United States Judiciary branch uniformly and [I]decisively [/I]rejected your camp's claims of fraud and illegality. Period. Cry to your friends, blame the media if you like, but that will do nothing to change the facts: Trump got his fanny spanked. Not only that, his incompetence cost him the house in 2018, and the Senate in 2020. Great legacy, indeed. [/QUOTE]

Verification