Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zubenelgenubi" data-source="post: 4774524" data-attributes="member: 63706">One of those you posted actually undermines your whole argument. Kelly v. Pennsylvania. The laches doctrine is a legal cop out. If challenges to the law were made before damages, it would have been dismissed for no standing. Once the damage is done, it&#039;s too late, sorry, can&#039;t unboil the egg. Even if it were too late to allow the judge to make any decisions that would affect the outcome of this election (completely absurd), why not hear it and rule on the merits for the future? In Trump v Boockvar the court decided not rejecting ballots that didn&#039;t match signature files was ok. Boy, if Illinois felt the same way, Obama would never have been senator or president. What&#039;s the reasoning for not allowing signature challenges in a Presidential election? That sounds completely up and up. You picked your 4 strongest cases to support your parroting leftist media lies, one is the perfect example of my argument, another you would scream about the decision if it was your guy. I&#039;ll tell you what, I&#039;ll just give you the other two so you can feel ok about the time and effort you put in coming up with those.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="zubenelgenubi, post: 4774524, member: 63706"] One of those you posted actually undermines your whole argument. Kelly v. Pennsylvania. The laches doctrine is a legal cop out. If challenges to the law were made before damages, it would have been dismissed for no standing. Once the damage is done, it's too late, sorry, can't unboil the egg. Even if it were too late to allow the judge to make any decisions that would affect the outcome of this election (completely absurd), why not hear it and rule on the merits for the future? In Trump v Boockvar the court decided not rejecting ballots that didn't match signature files was ok. Boy, if Illinois felt the same way, Obama would never have been senator or president. What's the reasoning for not allowing signature challenges in a Presidential election? That sounds completely up and up. You picked your 4 strongest cases to support your parroting leftist media lies, one is the perfect example of my argument, another you would scream about the decision if it was your guy. I'll tell you what, I'll just give you the other two so you can feel ok about the time and effort you put in coming up with those. [/QUOTE]

Verification