Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Storming the Capitol
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Macbrother" data-source="post: 4781838" data-attributes="member: 42759"><p>I already posted some:</p><p></p><p><em><em>Bowyer et al. vs Ducey et al. </em></em>Arizona. Ruling: Fraud allegations vague, implausible. Evidence unreliable or irrelevant.</p><p></p><p><em>Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar et al. </em>Pennsylvania. Ruling: "This Court has been presented with strained</p><p>legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations unsupported by evidence."</p><p></p><p><em>Donald J Trump for President vs Hobbs. </em>Arizona. Trump's own lawyers admitted affidavits submitted were spam. Under questioning none of the witnesses indicated they had a basis to believe their vote was improperly counted. Case dismissed.</p><p></p><p>Look at the cases for yourself. I don't know where this silly notion of "The courts refused to hear anything!!!!" came from, right-wing ideologues shouting into a microphone, no doubt; but again - all of these cases are a matter of public record. See them for yourselves.</p><p></p><p>Democrats have no such power. America saw four years of Trump and said "No thanks," simple as that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Macbrother, post: 4781838, member: 42759"] I already posted some: [I][I]Bowyer et al. vs Ducey et al. [/I][/I]Arizona. Ruling: Fraud allegations vague, implausible. Evidence unreliable or irrelevant. [I]Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar et al. [/I]Pennsylvania. Ruling: "This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations unsupported by evidence." [I]Donald J Trump for President vs Hobbs. [/I]Arizona. Trump's own lawyers admitted affidavits submitted were spam. Under questioning none of the witnesses indicated they had a basis to believe their vote was improperly counted. Case dismissed. Look at the cases for yourself. I don't know where this silly notion of "The courts refused to hear anything!!!!" came from, right-wing ideologues shouting into a microphone, no doubt; but again - all of these cases are a matter of public record. See them for yourselves. Democrats have no such power. America saw four years of Trump and said "No thanks," simple as that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Storming the Capitol
Top