Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Storming the Capitol
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fishtm2001" data-source="post: 4895811" data-attributes="member: 54375"><p>"The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion."</p><p></p><p>US District Judge Cynthia Bashant</p><p></p><p>That's a lot different than; </p><p></p><p>"The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "</p><p></p><p> "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive<s> with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes."</s></p><p><s></s></p><p><s>Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."</s></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fishtm2001, post: 4895811, member: 54375"] "The context of Maddow's statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be opinion." US District Judge Cynthia Bashant That's a lot different than; "The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' " "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes." Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable."[/s] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Storming the Capitol
Top