Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="newfie" data-source="post: 5291466" data-attributes="member: 58700">He has no responsibility for the second item you list other than to have it investigated which he did with the Durham appointment.He would have direct responsibility with the first if he allowed an election to be stolen on his watch. He pretty much has to deny it happened for his own credibility. I&#039;ve said it before and I&#039;ll say it again. Whether you agree or disagree that this one or Hillaries was stolen the fact remains that our founders as brillant as they were did not allow for the day when a presidential election is or will be stolen.&nbsp; No court will hear it and no VP will overturn it unless thousands of those that were guilty came forward immediately and confessed their actions.The window is too small for that to happen. In this case would it be easy for dem to convince others that Trump is the anti-christ and therefore the end justifies the means?Dems win presidential elections in the big cities.&nbsp; Can anyone ever actually crack a democratic stronghold and catch election fraud when no one in that stronghold will ever assist in the investigation. So the answer is to either set the rules ahead of the election to prevent the cheating or be a better cheater than the other side.Lenin -<h3>Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.</h3></blockquote>

[QUOTE="newfie, post: 5291466, member: 58700"] He has no responsibility for the second item you list other than to have it investigated which he did with the Durham appointment. He would have direct responsibility with the first if he allowed an election to be stolen on his watch. He pretty much has to deny it happened for his own credibility. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Whether you agree or disagree that this one or Hillaries was stolen the fact remains that our founders as brillant as they were did not allow for the day when a presidential election is or will be stolen. No court will hear it and no VP will overturn it unless thousands of those that were guilty came forward immediately and confessed their actions. The window is too small for that to happen. In this case would it be easy for dem to convince others that Trump is the anti-christ and therefore the end justifies the means? Dems win presidential elections in the big cities. Can anyone ever actually crack a democratic stronghold and catch election fraud when no one in that stronghold will ever assist in the investigation. So the answer is to either set the rules ahead of the election to prevent the cheating or be a better cheater than the other side. Lenin - [HEADING=2]Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.[/HEADING] [/QUOTE]

Verification