Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="bbsam" data-source="post: 5469914" data-attributes="member: 22662">I mean, when you’re trying to get a “do over” and only the Constitution is standing in your way, then yeah, shred that rag.By comparison, Al Gore didn’t come close to suggesting such a thing and that Supreme Court maneuvering was suspect.Garland should probably be sitting on the Supreme Court now but for the Constitutional provision that the Senate would have consent powers.Second Amendment voters have a whole slew of complaints against states across the country that bring the Constitution into question.Only one person seems to have the monumental hubris and recklessness to suggest shredding the Constitution for personal gain.</blockquote>