Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Strike Rumors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brownIEman" data-source="post: 770523" data-attributes="member: 14596"><p>Exactly. The purpose of the minimum language in the contract is to ensure no one is paid less under any circumstances. To try and use that language to say "hey, it says minimum, so UPS can pay more if they want to" is ignoring the purpose behind the language. It is just an idiotic thing to suggest. And it would be an idiotic thing for UPS to do, as once they started paying higher in one area due to changing conditions, they certainly would not be able to pull it back to the contractual minimum if those conditions changed. It is just a silly argument. Its basis is in claiming that the minimum language is in the contract to allow UPS to pay more, when, in fact as you have pointed out the purpose of the language is to ensure UPS does not try to pay less for special circumstances.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brownIEman, post: 770523, member: 14596"] Exactly. The purpose of the minimum language in the contract is to ensure no one is paid less under any circumstances. To try and use that language to say "hey, it says minimum, so UPS can pay more if they want to" is ignoring the purpose behind the language. It is just an idiotic thing to suggest. And it would be an idiotic thing for UPS to do, as once they started paying higher in one area due to changing conditions, they certainly would not be able to pull it back to the contractual minimum if those conditions changed. It is just a silly argument. Its basis is in claiming that the minimum language is in the contract to allow UPS to pay more, when, in fact as you have pointed out the purpose of the language is to ensure UPS does not try to pay less for special circumstances. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Strike Rumors
Top