Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Strike Rumors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JonFrum" data-source="post: 771144" data-attributes="member: 18044"><p>Maybe you advocated a milder version of THE SCHEME than others at the time.</p><p> </p><p>Did you believe that is was OK to not hire women because they were female, and not hire middle-aged older people because they were not in their teens and twenties, and not hire non-students, even though the job doesn't require any College at all?</p><p>- - - -</p><p>You didn't notice there has been a massive 22.3 retaliation campaign???? We must work for different companies!!!!</p><p>- - - -</p><p>Back then, part-timers worked long hours, with some of those hours at time-and-a-half. The jobs would have been considered full-time if performed at any other company, even if they wern't a full 40 hours per week. They were "part-time" at UPS because they were <u>called</u> "part-time" by UPS and Teamster negotiators and carried part-time benefits and seniority.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JonFrum, post: 771144, member: 18044"] Maybe you advocated a milder version of THE SCHEME than others at the time. Did you believe that is was OK to not hire women because they were female, and not hire middle-aged older people because they were not in their teens and twenties, and not hire non-students, even though the job doesn't require any College at all? - - - - You didn't notice there has been a massive 22.3 retaliation campaign???? We must work for different companies!!!! - - - - Back then, part-timers worked long hours, with some of those hours at time-and-a-half. The jobs would have been considered full-time if performed at any other company, even if they wern't a full 40 hours per week. They were "part-time" at UPS because they were [U]called[/U] "part-time" by UPS and Teamster negotiators and carried part-time benefits and seniority. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Union Issues
Strike Rumors
Top