Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="vantexan" data-source="post: 3428022" data-attributes="member: 24302"><p>But it still was a battle.&nbsp; Since you brought it up when we defeated Indian tribes we didn&#039;t shoot them all in the back of the head or gas them in chambers.&nbsp; We put them on set aside land and gave them assistance.&nbsp; Nowhere near as bad as the way the Nazis brutalized civilian populations in the Balkans, killing millions in gas chambers, or the Japanese over running China killing 20 million, brutalizing POW&#039;s, or forcing 90,000 Korean and Filipina women to service the Japanese Army.&nbsp; Plenty of brutality on both sides in the Indian Wars, and if they hadn&#039;t been decimated by the diseases we brought they may have won those wars and fended off European colonization.&nbsp; But you guys always want to advance the narrative that the U.S. is just as bad as everyone else when the conversation turns to WWII brutality.&nbsp; No we aren&#039;t.&nbsp; No we weren&#039;t.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="vantexan, post: 3428022, member: 24302"] But it still was a battle. Since you brought it up when we defeated Indian tribes we didn't shoot them all in the back of the head or gas them in chambers. We put them on set aside land and gave them assistance. Nowhere near as bad as the way the Nazis brutalized civilian populations in the Balkans, killing millions in gas chambers, or the Japanese over running China killing 20 million, brutalizing POW's, or forcing 90,000 Korean and Filipina women to service the Japanese Army. Plenty of brutality on both sides in the Indian Wars, and if they hadn't been decimated by the diseases we brought they may have won those wars and fended off European colonization. But you guys always want to advance the narrative that the U.S. is just as bad as everyone else when the conversation turns to WWII brutality. No we aren't. No we weren't. [/QUOTE]

Verification