Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dmac1" data-source="post: 4817994" data-attributes="member: 60252">The constitution say NOTHING about defending yourself from the government. As such a genius of history, you should know that. Instead you parrot back what Hannity tells you without bothering to even check for yourself. Pay attention to the comma and the words &#039;well regulated.&#039;2nd AmendmentA well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.Put is this way- people have a right to be part of a &#039;well regulated&#039; militia, and thus bear arms, because a militia is necessary. We have a militia- the US defense forces, and you have the right to join and bear arms. If they don&#039;t accept you because you are a right wing ignorant crazy, you can&#039;t bear arms.There is NOTHING about defending yourself from the government. Maybe there is some right inferred in creating a separate &#039;well regulated&#039; militia other that the government&#039;s militia, but I am sure any regulations imposed would restrict the right to attack the government. Sedition and attempted overthrow is a crime, and would not be a crime if any Tom, Dick, or vantexan had the right to bear arms to overthrow it. Your illogic is plain for all thinking people to see, which limits it to non-Trumpy to believe.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dmac1, post: 4817994, member: 60252"] The constitution say NOTHING about defending yourself from the government. As such a genius of history, you should know that. Instead you parrot back what Hannity tells you without bothering to even check for yourself. Pay attention to the comma and the words 'well regulated.' 2nd Amendment A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Put is this way- people have a right to be part of a 'well regulated' militia, and thus bear arms, because a militia is necessary. We have a militia- the US defense forces, and you have the right to join and bear arms. If they don't accept you because you are a right wing ignorant crazy, you can't bear arms. There is NOTHING about defending yourself from the government. Maybe there is some right inferred in creating a separate 'well regulated' militia other that the government's militia, but I am sure any regulations imposed would restrict the right to attack the government. Sedition and attempted overthrow is a crime, and would not be a crime if any Tom, Dick, or vantexan had the right to bear arms to overthrow it. Your illogic is plain for all thinking people to see, which limits it to non-Trumpy to believe. [/QUOTE]

Verification