Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Stupid arguments about the Ground business model
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dmac1" data-source="post: 4822425" data-attributes="member: 60252"><p>It talks about influencing voters, and then says NO person can hand out water. Just like the constitution talks about a 'well regulated militia, and goes on to say anyone can arm himself. At least, in the second amendment, it is all one sentence, so there should be a question, but in this case, there is no question that NO person can give any person in line to vote any food or water. </p><p>The law does NOT say you can't give water to influence. It says you simply can't give water. If they really wanted to clarify that relatives or caretakers could give water, like they specifically mention in other parts of the bill regarding assisting filling out or delivering ballots to drop boxes, they could have, but the clear intent was to make it more difficult, even by denying water to people waiting. The law does say that the polling location can make water available, but does not make it a requirement. If a location has long lines, and no one is allowed to hand out water, the location should be REQUIRED to make water available.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dmac1, post: 4822425, member: 60252"] It talks about influencing voters, and then says NO person can hand out water. Just like the constitution talks about a 'well regulated militia, and goes on to say anyone can arm himself. At least, in the second amendment, it is all one sentence, so there should be a question, but in this case, there is no question that NO person can give any person in line to vote any food or water. The law does NOT say you can't give water to influence. It says you simply can't give water. If they really wanted to clarify that relatives or caretakers could give water, like they specifically mention in other parts of the bill regarding assisting filling out or delivering ballots to drop boxes, they could have, but the clear intent was to make it more difficult, even by denying water to people waiting. The law does say that the polling location can make water available, but does not make it a requirement. If a location has long lines, and no one is allowed to hand out water, the location should be REQUIRED to make water available. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
Stupid arguments about the Ground business model
Top