Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Stupidvisors working...a political debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="av8torntn" data-source="post: 341611" data-attributes="member: 8259"><p>Are you saying that the only way to store sarin is in gas form or that you believe that is the only way the Iraqis knew how to store it? </p><p> </p><p>I do not think visivible leaks would be uncommon for weapons stored in a third world country and I also wonder why you included that. I think if anything this would add to the dificulity of destruction.</p><p> </p><p>You may want to consider that the use of chemical weapons may not have been the strategy of the Iraqi Hussein (not to be confused with the American Hussein). While they did not have control of the skies they were able to use </p><p>FA to some extent of course not as effectively as they would have liked.</p><p> </p><p>Since you cite the Iraq report to the UN you know in that report they talk about the rocket warheads that were found designed for use with chemical weapons. This would avoid the need for control of airspace. They also mention the binary storage of sarin which since you guys want to talk about shelf life would be of more than a little interest.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="av8torntn, post: 341611, member: 8259"] Are you saying that the only way to store sarin is in gas form or that you believe that is the only way the Iraqis knew how to store it? I do not think visivible leaks would be uncommon for weapons stored in a third world country and I also wonder why you included that. I think if anything this would add to the dificulity of destruction. You may want to consider that the use of chemical weapons may not have been the strategy of the Iraqi Hussein (not to be confused with the American Hussein). While they did not have control of the skies they were able to use FA to some extent of course not as effectively as they would have liked. Since you cite the Iraq report to the UN you know in that report they talk about the rocket warheads that were found designed for use with chemical weapons. This would avoid the need for control of airspace. They also mention the binary storage of sarin which since you guys want to talk about shelf life would be of more than a little interest. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Stupidvisors working...a political debate
Top