Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DriveInDriѵeOut" data-source="post: 4607239" data-attributes="member: 44954"><a href="https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/02/joe-biden-nafta-2020-1296786" target="_blank">&quot;In the Senate, Biden voted for the North American Free Trade Agreement and permanent normal trade relations with China. As then-President Barack Obama&#039;s No. 2, he supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership.&quot;</a><a href="https://www.epi.org/publication/webfeatures_snapshots_archive_12102003/#:~:text=Between%201993%20and%202002%2C%20NAFTA,loss%20of%20879%2C280%20U.S.%20jobs." target="_blank">Between 1993 and 2002, NAFTA resulted in an increase in exports that created 794,194 jobs, but it displaced production that would have supported 1,673,454 jobs (see figure). Thus, the combined effect of changes in imports and exports as a result of NAFTA was a loss of 879,280 U.S. jobs.</a>[ATTACH=full]308878[/ATTACH]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DriveInDriѵeOut, post: 4607239, member: 44954"] [URL='https://www.politico.com/story/2019/05/02/joe-biden-nafta-2020-1296786']"In the Senate, [B][SIZE=5]Biden voted for the North American Free Trade Agreement[/SIZE][/B] and permanent normal trade relations with China. As then-President Barack Obama's No. 2, he supported the Trans-Pacific Partnership."[/URL] [URL='https://www.epi.org/publication/webfeatures_snapshots_archive_12102003/#:~:text=Between%201993%20and%202002%2C%20NAFTA,loss%20of%20879%2C280%20U.S.%20jobs.']Between 1993 and 2002, [B][SIZE=5]NAFTA resulted in[/SIZE][/B] an increase in exports that created 794,194 jobs, but it displaced production that would have supported 1,673,454 jobs (see figure). Thus, the combined effect of changes in imports and exports as a result of NAFTA was [B][SIZE=5]a loss of 879,280 U.S. jobs.[/SIZE][/B][/URL][B][SIZE=5][/SIZE][/B] [ATTACH type="full" alt="ACF11E.gif"]308878[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]

Verification