Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Teamsters Endorse OBAMA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dannyboy" data-source="post: 409084" data-attributes="member: 484"><p>mike</p><p> </p><p>i find it interesting you will not answer specific questions with specific answers. much like you dems say palin is doing. but i think it runs deeper than that.</p><p> </p><p>unless it is a blurb that sounds good, and is under 2 seconds long, most dems can not remember why they vote the way they vote. most, like you are single issue voters. the teamsters said to, they are pro choice, anti gun, pro gay, environmental issues, and the list is wide and varried. </p><p> </p><p>but ask serious questions about how they will fix things, and the answer is just like yours. no commitment to any serious issues, only that the goobermetn or the union will take care of you. ask central states how that worked out. and i still dont get how you think the teamsters are pro joe, when they, not ups figured out that the part timers were expendable this contract. Can you read that mike, <span style="font-size: 15px"><strong><u>the teamsters, not ups, figured out that the part time ups employee was expendable to the contract.</u></strong></span><span style="font-size: 10px"><u> maybe that is why they are quitting the union in droves, and new signups are not there.</u> at least where they have a choice. </span></p><p> </p><p>funny, only in states where an employee does not have a choice.......why would that be if the teamsters were such a good bunch of guys that offer so much to the working class joe?</p><p> </p><p>and that same union that sold the part timers out this contract is not capable of selling you out later on? why not?</p><p> </p><p>and most if not all of the dems want more gooberment regulations to go along with the 27 billion pages of rules and regulations we already have. sure, put more power into the hands of those that have proven not to be trustworthy. </p><p> </p><p>my personal view is that we can learn a lot from the chinese. not too long ago, there was a politician that skimmed money off the dam project over there, millions. they had his trial, his apeal. when it was proven he was guilty, two days later they passed out the judgement. </p><p> </p><p>maybe if instead of rewarding crooks by letting them go (did you realize clinton pardoned one of the forbes 400 guys after he ran out on his bail after being found guilty of corruption and fraud) or rewarding them will million dollar salaries, but instead a firing squad? maybe they will think twice?</p><p> </p><p>i am totally afraid of obamas ideals. outside of that, i would vote for him in a second. the second choice is not much better. I am just glad bush is not running again.</p><p> </p><p>i still take palin in 18 months.</p><p> </p><p>d</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dannyboy, post: 409084, member: 484"] mike i find it interesting you will not answer specific questions with specific answers. much like you dems say palin is doing. but i think it runs deeper than that. unless it is a blurb that sounds good, and is under 2 seconds long, most dems can not remember why they vote the way they vote. most, like you are single issue voters. the teamsters said to, they are pro choice, anti gun, pro gay, environmental issues, and the list is wide and varried. but ask serious questions about how they will fix things, and the answer is just like yours. no commitment to any serious issues, only that the goobermetn or the union will take care of you. ask central states how that worked out. and i still dont get how you think the teamsters are pro joe, when they, not ups figured out that the part timers were expendable this contract. Can you read that mike, [SIZE=4][B][U]the teamsters, not ups, figured out that the part time ups employee was expendable to the contract.[/U][/B][/SIZE][SIZE=2][U] maybe that is why they are quitting the union in droves, and new signups are not there.[/U] at least where they have a choice. [/SIZE] funny, only in states where an employee does not have a choice.......why would that be if the teamsters were such a good bunch of guys that offer so much to the working class joe? and that same union that sold the part timers out this contract is not capable of selling you out later on? why not? and most if not all of the dems want more gooberment regulations to go along with the 27 billion pages of rules and regulations we already have. sure, put more power into the hands of those that have proven not to be trustworthy. my personal view is that we can learn a lot from the chinese. not too long ago, there was a politician that skimmed money off the dam project over there, millions. they had his trial, his apeal. when it was proven he was guilty, two days later they passed out the judgement. maybe if instead of rewarding crooks by letting them go (did you realize clinton pardoned one of the forbes 400 guys after he ran out on his bail after being found guilty of corruption and fraud) or rewarding them will million dollar salaries, but instead a firing squad? maybe they will think twice? i am totally afraid of obamas ideals. outside of that, i would vote for him in a second. the second choice is not much better. I am just glad bush is not running again. i still take palin in 18 months. d [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe Community Center
Current Events
Teamsters Endorse OBAMA
Top