Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="floridays" data-source="post: 4937849" data-attributes="member: 68849">The point is it was an action brought by UPS to gain the same classification as Fedex.I&#039;ve read it, The whole damn thing that you cannot site.The case does not have anything to do with the proper classification of Fedex, the coprt did not address this question.Period.The court relied on previous and current definitions.The question was not whether Fedex was an airline it was UPS attempt to get a portion of it&#039;s company treated as an airline under RWLA provisions.The fact is no, none of any ground operations, couriers, station any part of the ground portion of the airline portion has sought relief or a judgment pertaining to that segment of the whole, total operation of Federal Express, at that time or FedEx currently.This buster is my lane, the claims you have made (court cases) are unsubstantiated and cannot be provided.My limited education is directed in one lane.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="floridays, post: 4937849, member: 68849"] The point is it was an action brought by UPS to gain the same classification as Fedex. I've read it, The whole damn thing that you cannot site. The case does not have anything to do with the proper classification of Fedex, the coprt did not address this question. Period. The court relied on previous and current definitions. The question was not whether Fedex was an airline it was UPS attempt to get a portion of it's company treated as an airline under RWLA provisions. The fact is no, none of any ground operations, couriers, station any part of the ground portion of the airline portion has sought relief or a judgment pertaining to that segment of the whole, total operation of Federal Express, at that time or FedEx currently. This buster is my lane, the claims you have made (court cases) are unsubstantiated and cannot be provided. My limited education is directed in one lane. [/QUOTE]

Verification