Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Terminated For Gross Negligence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Leftinbuilding" data-source="post: 306395" data-attributes="member: 5023"><p>Can't say for positive, but I believe here in Calif you can be found at least partially at fault if you pull out in front of someone and they hit you. The fact he was speeding makes him liable also. It still seems to me we are missing part of the story. Was the cross street straight/level? Daylight? Weather? As someone said earlier, I can't believe UPS would leave themselves so openly liable to lawsuits without being absolutely sure in their position. And then every subsequent hearing agrees? Sounds funny to me...........</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Leftinbuilding, post: 306395, member: 5023"] Can't say for positive, but I believe here in Calif you can be found at least partially at fault if you pull out in front of someone and they hit you. The fact he was speeding makes him liable also. It still seems to me we are missing part of the story. Was the cross street straight/level? Daylight? Weather? As someone said earlier, I can't believe UPS would leave themselves so openly liable to lawsuits without being absolutely sure in their position. And then every subsequent hearing agrees? Sounds funny to me........... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Brown Cafe UPS Forum
UPS Discussions
Terminated For Gross Negligence
Top