Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The Big News
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="59 Dano" data-source="post: 862904" data-attributes="member: 23516"><p>Yeah, but they can't simply throw all the money into one big figurative pot to be doled out as desired while operating as separate opcos under the parent company. Not as a publicly traded company. The SEC would rip them a new one for that kind of stuff. I mean, they can do what they want with the money, but they have certain laws/guidelines/regulations that dictate how it must be done in regards to the accounting aspect of it. It has to be visible. To this point, there's nothing in their financials over the last 4 fiscal years that even suggest that this has been going on.</p><p></p><p>I don't know the specifics of each state's rules for unemployment. I suspect some are more generous than others. As snackdad mentioned, it's not hard to legitmately fire someone. Remember that package that you forgot to deliver to that customer who had 10 other pkgs that you delivered at 1026? Remember how you went back at 1035 and gave it to them and told them not to worry about signing for that one because you'd fix it on your end and that was cool with them because they like you and are easygoing anyhow? And remember how when you got back at the end of the day, you manually entered the POD for that pkg and the time you entered was 1026?</p><p></p><p>There's your falsification, an offense that can get you booted and will probably keep you from collecting benefits. I've yet to meet anyone in the company who hasn't falsified something. Some do it as an absolute last resort while some, sadly, rely on it. If someone were to go fishing for something like that, he's gonna find it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="59 Dano, post: 862904, member: 23516"] Yeah, but they can't simply throw all the money into one big figurative pot to be doled out as desired while operating as separate opcos under the parent company. Not as a publicly traded company. The SEC would rip them a new one for that kind of stuff. I mean, they can do what they want with the money, but they have certain laws/guidelines/regulations that dictate how it must be done in regards to the accounting aspect of it. It has to be visible. To this point, there's nothing in their financials over the last 4 fiscal years that even suggest that this has been going on. I don't know the specifics of each state's rules for unemployment. I suspect some are more generous than others. As snackdad mentioned, it's not hard to legitmately fire someone. Remember that package that you forgot to deliver to that customer who had 10 other pkgs that you delivered at 1026? Remember how you went back at 1035 and gave it to them and told them not to worry about signing for that one because you'd fix it on your end and that was cool with them because they like you and are easygoing anyhow? And remember how when you got back at the end of the day, you manually entered the POD for that pkg and the time you entered was 1026? There's your falsification, an offense that can get you booted and will probably keep you from collecting benefits. I've yet to meet anyone in the company who hasn't falsified something. Some do it as an absolute last resort while some, sadly, rely on it. If someone were to go fishing for something like that, he's gonna find it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The Big News
Top