Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The FedEx driver who sued and won
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="M I Indy" data-source="post: 1456131" data-attributes="member: 52889"><p>Shows what you have been saying is true? How? Change the law? Why? As long as both sides work within spirit and intent of the law. When you become a corporation, you are compelled to do this, since you have been afforded the entitlement. You are supposed to exercise this, since you now control employees. Why can't you subcontract like X? Both of you are corporations. Oh, because they wrote in the contract you can't, no control there. Sounds like a tail, but, let's call it a leg, yeah that will make it so. Idea? Makes a lot of sense! Word "floated" is the key in that sentence. Only one with that idea is YOU. Keep grabbing them out of the sky. Retainer by 30,000 plus? That would be a binding agreement. Are you sure you would want to go there? What happens when the "department" says you can't do it the way you want, will you still pay the retainer, or will you say "screw you" I ain't paying for something I don't like? Again, a shot at those you wish to represent you, not where the money is. Maybe this wouldn't be an issue if X wished to correctly represent this type of contract law or social justice, but, that's not where the money is! Please take up reading, you might learn something; fairy tales, unicorns, X contract, can be found in the fantasy section of your favorite book store. I suggest you stop at the section just before it, the one titled, fact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="M I Indy, post: 1456131, member: 52889"] Shows what you have been saying is true? How? Change the law? Why? As long as both sides work within spirit and intent of the law. When you become a corporation, you are compelled to do this, since you have been afforded the entitlement. You are supposed to exercise this, since you now control employees. Why can't you subcontract like X? Both of you are corporations. Oh, because they wrote in the contract you can't, no control there. Sounds like a tail, but, let's call it a leg, yeah that will make it so. Idea? Makes a lot of sense! Word "floated" is the key in that sentence. Only one with that idea is YOU. Keep grabbing them out of the sky. Retainer by 30,000 plus? That would be a binding agreement. Are you sure you would want to go there? What happens when the "department" says you can't do it the way you want, will you still pay the retainer, or will you say "screw you" I ain't paying for something I don't like? Again, a shot at those you wish to represent you, not where the money is. Maybe this wouldn't be an issue if X wished to correctly represent this type of contract law or social justice, but, that's not where the money is! Please take up reading, you might learn something; fairy tales, unicorns, X contract, can be found in the fantasy section of your favorite book store. I suggest you stop at the section just before it, the one titled, fact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The FedEx driver who sued and won
Top