Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The FedEx driver who sued and won
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="M I Indy" data-source="post: 1456146" data-attributes="member: 52889"><p>I like how everyone is interpreting this article as to how it is written. Suddenly the reporter has the entire case and all wrapped up in the thousand or so words given to them by their editor. Can't believe just what you read. Maybe, Reggie has a hard time expressing what happened in perfect text or legalese. As Sammy stated, X lawyer's are not a bunch of Cousin Vinny's, yet Reggie the boohoo kicked their butt. Why? Because the evidence presented showed he was wronged. Maybe he was told to buy an econoline for the job. That it is was the only vehicle to meet X specifications that were in place at the time. Maybe manifest was a paper sheet when he contracted and was never told he would be forced to lease a scanner down the road. Addendums were handed down almost as much as settlement checks in those days. You folks should read the "decision", review evidence presented, possibly contact the law firm that represented Reggie now that case is over and they no longer have any skin in the game. I guess it's more fun to just throw out nonsense with no knowledge. I commend Reggie, right or wrong, for standing up for his belief that he was wronged. Reggie asked the question, good for him, because if you never ask the answer is always no. No class action here, Sammy, just a firm trying to right a wrong, whatever their payout was, you can rest assured it outspent its return, with X delays and procedural nonsense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="M I Indy, post: 1456146, member: 52889"] I like how everyone is interpreting this article as to how it is written. Suddenly the reporter has the entire case and all wrapped up in the thousand or so words given to them by their editor. Can't believe just what you read. Maybe, Reggie has a hard time expressing what happened in perfect text or legalese. As Sammy stated, X lawyer's are not a bunch of Cousin Vinny's, yet Reggie the boohoo kicked their butt. Why? Because the evidence presented showed he was wronged. Maybe he was told to buy an econoline for the job. That it is was the only vehicle to meet X specifications that were in place at the time. Maybe manifest was a paper sheet when he contracted and was never told he would be forced to lease a scanner down the road. Addendums were handed down almost as much as settlement checks in those days. You folks should read the "decision", review evidence presented, possibly contact the law firm that represented Reggie now that case is over and they no longer have any skin in the game. I guess it's more fun to just throw out nonsense with no knowledge. I commend Reggie, right or wrong, for standing up for his belief that he was wronged. Reggie asked the question, good for him, because if you never ask the answer is always no. No class action here, Sammy, just a firm trying to right a wrong, whatever their payout was, you can rest assured it outspent its return, with X delays and procedural nonsense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
The Competition
FedEx Discussions
The FedEx driver who sued and won
Top